Characterizing General Preferential Entailments

نویسنده

  • Yves Moinard
چکیده

A preferential entailment is defined by a binary relation, or “preference relation”. This relation can be either among interpretations or among sets of interpretations. The relation can be also among “states” which are “copies of interpretations”, or “copies of sets of interpretations”. This provides four kinds of preferential entailments. The paper deals mainly with propositional logic, however this work applies also to the first order case and indications are given in order to describe the situation in first order logic. What we do here is to provide a characterization result for the most general version described above, and to compare with the known characterizations of the “simplest” versions. It appears that the apparently most complicated notion possesses by far the simplest characterization result. A by-product of our results is that the definition can be simplified without loss of generality: we can define directly the relation among sets of interpretations, eliminating the need for “states” in this case. Thus only three kinds of “preferential entailment” remain.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

General Preferential Entailments as Circumscriptions

A (general) preferential entailment is defined by a “preference relation” among “states”. States can be either interpretations or sets of interpretations, or “copies” of interpretations or of sets of interpretations, although it is known that the second kind and the fourth one produce the same notion. Circumscription is a special case of the simplest kind, where the states are interpretations. ...

متن کامل

A Preferential Framework for Trivialization-Resistant Reasoning with Inconsistent Information

Paraconsistent entailments based on more than two truthvalues are useful formalisms for handling inconsistent information in large knowledge bases. However, such entailments suffer from two major drawbacks: they are often too cautious to allow intuitive classical inference, and are trivialization-prone. Two preferential mechanisms have been proposed to deal with these two problems, but they are...

متن کامل

Linking Makinson and Kraus-Lehmann-Magidor preferential entailments

Twelve years ago, various notions of preferential entailment have been introduced. The main reference is a paper by Kraus, Lehmann and Magidor (KLM), one of the main competitor being a more general version defined by Makinson (MAK). These two versions have already been compared, but it is time to revisit these comparisons. Here are our main results: (1) These two notions are equivalent, provide...

متن کامل

Preferential Reasoning Based On Abstract Argumentation Semantics

We introduce a preferential-based setting for reasoning with different types of argumentation-based semantics, including those that are not necessarily conflict-free or admissible. The induced entailments are defined by n-valued labeling and may be computed by answer-set programs.

متن کامل

Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Conditional Objects and Possibility Theory

This short paper relates the conditional object-based and possibility theorybased approaches for reasoning with conditional statements pervaded with exceptions, to other methods in nonmonotonic reasoning which have been independently proposed: namely, Lehmann's preferential and rational closure entailments which obey normative postulates, the infinitesimal probability approach, and the conditio...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2000